Friday, October 23, 2009

Beta Bust: Links for ACT< --> Quickbooks

Call for participants to test various add-on solutions that link ACT! to QuickBooks to replace the hole left when Sage chose not to release an update to ACT! Link for QuickBooks. The Enterprise version of QuickBooks will be tested too.


Time: Now through Nov 5th, 2009
Where: Virtual and in Southern California
Who: ACT! and/or QB Certified Consultants

Test four solutions coming into addon marketplace:

  • dbLinkUp -- RDA Enterprises, Inc.
  • DataPlus for QuickBooks -- DataPlus
  • QBSalesData -- Effective Solutions
  • Xact Link for QuickBooks -- Xact Software
Contributors to the collective KB will be entitled to receive a solution matrix, a comprehensive comparison chart. In addition, demo databases may be available to those who exhibit significant contribution to the comparison worksheet.

Prerequisites: ACT Certified Consultant and/or QuickBooks Certified ProAdvisor with recent versions of both ACT! and QuickBooks software. NFR versions of addon link software can be arranged.

To be considered for beta testing team, visit www.crm-it.net and click on Contact to send email.

Monday, October 19, 2009

Fall Out of Blocked Email Hits Thousands of Verizon Subscribers But Has Little Effect to Stem Spam

Verizon internet service division has recently changed policy which effectively blocks ordinary outgoing email from any non-Verizon address in a strategy aimed at reducing Verizon’s ignominious title as the largest ISPs in the United States permitting spam. Yet according to a published study by University of Texas Center for Research in Electronic Commerce, this step “did not stop increasing spam coming from Verizon…”.

Brian Krebs, a security expert blogger for Washington Post says, “Verizon.net is home to more than twice as many spam-spewing zombies as any other major Internet service provider in the United States, according to an analysis of the most recent data from anti-spam outfit Spamhaus.org.”

Recently Verizon spokesman Clifford Lee announced the company plans to shift to using Port 587 for e-mail originating on the Verizon network. This notice particularly affects Verizon DSL subscribers who have a professional email addresses associated with a business or organization using e-mail clients like Outlook, Outlook Express, Eudora and Thunderbird. Unless the e-mail is routed thorough Verizon e-mail server, email just sits in the Outbox.

In practical usage, some email clients and servers can be configured to use port 587 instead of 25, but there are numerous cases where this is not possible or convenient. Many third party providers do not recognize 587 as an allowable port. For instance, Networks Solutions has an alternative SMTP port 2525. However, Verizon does not recognize this access. Further testing shows, despite the ability to configure Port 587, it is impossible to log into a third party incoming mail server.

According to research Verizon Port 587 Requirement: Effects on Anti-Spam Blocklists published in July 2009 by University of Texas examined anti-spam blocking by Verizon over a three months period. The analysis of 31 Verizon owned ASNs (Autonomous System Numbers), concluded, despite the fact that Verizon has required the use of port 587, the tactic did not stop or even reduce spam coming from Verizon. In addition, study authors note that no other ISP has publicly announced port 587 requirements.

On August 8, 2001, Verizon made a similar move in New York which was quietly withdrawn when users objected to the address blocking by writing to the New York Public Utility Commission and the Federal Communication Commission.

Friday, October 16, 2009

Whack Whack

Folks at Engadget are pretty smart, but they just don't know how to whack it.

In an article paraphrasing Tim Berners-Lee, the man apparently having to do more with creating the World Wide Web than Al Gore, recently revealed that his only regret is that folks are forced to type out the, essentially unnecessary, double forward slash
to begin a network path or URL.

So my fav folks at Engadget got all that right but missed the opportunity to use one of my favorite terms
"whack, whack" used by IT pros to refer to the double forward slashes . So when your networking guy says "whack, whack", don't be scared. He's not signaling his plans to do a mobster mash up on you. Trust me though, he's capable of it.